grammar - One Language and Proof How it's ambiguous? -


i took midterm couldn't answer question.

how can show following language ambiguous ?

l={a n bm c p : n≠m} u {a n bm c p : m≠p}

i think hard, can me automated tools or ... how can prove ?

consider 1 possible grammar language {anbmcp : n≠m}:

s → x c | x b c x → ε | x b → | a b → b | b b c → ε | c c 

in grammar, left-most derivation of word not expand , c until other non-terminals have been expanded. similar grammar other half of union (anbmcp : m≠p} expand as before other non-terminal expanded. word in intersection of 2 subsets therefore have (at least) 2 distinct derivations.

proving language inherently ambiguous requires proving above true grammar language. such proof based on ogden's lemma, generalization of pumping lemma context free languages; proof consists of demonstrating word can "pumped" in 2 different ways.

it relatively easy find proof similar language {anbmcp : n=m} ∪ {anbmcp : m=p} inherently ambiguous: it's used example in textbooks on formal language theory. think proof language "more difficult" in requires consideration of more cases, should similar.

an alternative approach analytic method of flajolet.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

css - SVG using textPath a symbol not rendering in Firefox -

Java 8 + Maven Javadoc plugin: Error fetching URL -

node.js - How to abort query on demand using Neo4j drivers -