operating system - NTFS vs FAT32 Search Time -


i'm doing paper on ntfs vs fat32 , showing comparison between both file systems. far knowledge goes, know ntfs uses mft holding files , directories whereas fat32 knows following cluster specific file or directory. means fat32 doesn't know a-priori first block of file if not found first looking in specific directory.

my question following, if ntfs holds information regarding file system in file mean it's going faster when doing raw search filename "test.txt" within system? know, fat have scan every directory in hard drive , in each directory if filename exists whereas in ntfs, needs scan mft file contiguous record has name : "text.txt". right or i'm missing something?

i don't know, yes(40% bet), turn problem stack overflow coding on-topic here resources can find answer , give self-answer:

all of above resources should agree on concept , 2 last resources show how machines treat problem without marketing talk (machines don't understand marketing , advertising well)


-

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Java 8 + Maven Javadoc plugin: Error fetching URL -

i attempting generate javadoc links javadoc dependencies. have tried various means generate javadoc not produce qualified class names references classes dependencies. wanted links java doc simplified class names. however, java api classnames, no links , have qualified class names. working java 8. have following configuration: <plugin> <groupid>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupid> <artifactid>maven-javadoc-plugin</artifactid> <version>2.10.2</version> <configuration> <reportoutputdirectory>${project.basedir}/target</reportoutputdirectory> <destdir>javadoc</destdir> <windowtitle>epiphany</windowtitle> <doctitle>epiphany</doctitle> <show>private</show> <detectlinks>false</detectlinks> <detectoffline...
Read more

android - How to delete or change the searchview icon inside the SearchView actionBar? -

Image
how remove or change search view icon inside edittext? using appcompat library. i used below code modify , remove it's not working: searchmanager searchmanager = (searchmanager) getsystemservice(context.search_service); searchview.setsearchableinfo(searchmanager.getsearchableinfo(getcomponentname())); view search_mag_icon = (view)searchview.findviewbyid(android.support.v7.appcompat.r.id.search_mag_icon); search_mag_icon.setbackgroundresource(r.drawable.ic_stub); //search_mag_icon.setvisibility(view.gone); finally found solution. try following: try { field mdrawable = searchview.class.getdeclaredfield("msearchhinticon"); mdrawable.setaccessible(true); drawable drawable = (drawable)mdrawable.get(your search view here); drawable.setalpha(0); } catch (exception e) { e.printstacktrace(); }
Read more

c++ - Msgpack packing bools bug -

for c++ project use c++ msgpack library available in ubuntu (14.04) standard repository under name libmsgpack-dev. all works fine except when try pack bools. there things go absolutely bananas. first wrote simple test study pack method. turned out, can not trusted packing bools. here simple test showing problem: #include <msgpack.hpp> test_case("bool packing", "[msgpack1]") { msgpack::sbuffer buf; msgpack::packer<msgpack::sbuffer> p(&buf); std::string key = "boolvalue"; bool value = true; p.pack_map(1); { p.pack(key); p.pack(value); } msgpack::unpacked msg; msgpack::unpack(&msg, buf.data(), buf.size()); std::map<std::string, msgpack::object> m; msg.get().convert(&m); bool loaded_value; m.at(key).convert(&loaded_value); info("we packed: " << value); info("we loaded: " << loaded_value); r...
Read more